Changes for page RCI by OU

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -96,38 +96,5 @@
96	96
97	97	[[image:rci report - by ou.PNG]]
98	98
99		-Note initially that this is only the first page of the report. Because we selected Melbourne as an OU we wanted to consider when entering our parameters (and because it is first alphabetically), it was elaborated upon in this page. Each individual OU will occupy a unique page in your report.
100	100
101		-Note also that the instrument of our choice was CANS, but this report can apply to other instruments as well.
102		-
103		-
104		-
105		-Let's begin dissecting the report and the data it provides. Remember, again, that the RCI by OU Report enables you to track and understand the progress of your clients with regards to their scores on assessment domains and items in particular OUs across two assessment reasons (essentially over time).
106		-
107		-
108		-__Top__
109		-
110		-* the title of the report is featured prominently at the center of the first page
111		-* many of the parameters you entered are also included for your ease of remembrance (this includes the period of time you indicated was of interest and the OUs you selected).
112		-* also vital here is the two assessment reasons listed, as this is what provides the basis for any comparison.
113		-
114		-__Bottom__
115		-
116		-* your report includes a time stamp of the exact date and time the report was ordered (not pictured above).
117		-
118		-__Middle (DATA)__
119		-
120		-* Because we selected Melbourne as an OU of interest, its data is provided for us
121		-* We can see that there were 12 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters. This is because each row below the graph (representing a single domain or item) adds up to 12, implying 12 clients.
122		-* There will always be three columns on the bottom: one for decline, one for no change, and one for improvement
123		-* The domains and items you choose will be the ones that will be considered (e.g. Child Strengths and Culture)
124		-* The graph above and numerical data below show the same data, except for the fact that the numerical information provides absolute quantities (i.e. exact number of clients) instead of just percentages
125		-* However, the bar graph is often easier to understand and serves as a visual guide to your results. In fact, it has been color-coded to make the process easier:
126		-** RED: the red bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance declined between the two assessments, meaning their scores went up (e.g. someone could have gotten a 1 on their initial assessment and then a 3 on their scheduled update).
127		-** YELLOW: the yellow bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance stayed the same over the two assessments, meaning their scores remain unchanged
128		-** GREEN: the green bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance improved between the two assessments, meaning their scores went down (e.g. someone could have gotten a 3 on their initial assessment and then a 1 on their scheduled update).
129		-* Clearly, such data provides a useful tool when considering, for example:
130		-**
131		-
132		-why this would be useful
133	133	)))