Changes for page RCI by OU

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -119,7 +119,14 @@
119	119
120	120	* Because we selected Melbourne as an OU of interest, its data is provided for us
121	121	* We can see that there were 12 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters. This is because each row below the graph (representing a single domain or item) adds up to 12, implying 12 clients.
	122	+* There will always be three columns on the bottom: one for decline, one for no change, and one for improvement
122	122	* The domains and items you choose will be the ones that will be considered (e.g. Child Strengths and Culture)
123		-* The graph above and numerical data below show the same data, except for the fact that the
124		-*
	124	+* The graph above and numerical data below show the same data, except for the fact that the numerical information provides absolute quantities (i.e. exact number of clients) instead of just percentages
	125	+* However, the bar graph is often easier to understand and serves as a visual guide to your results. In fact, it has been color-coded to make the process easier:
	126	+** RED: the red bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance declined between the two assessments, meaning their scores went up (e.g. someone could have gotten a 1 on their initial assessment and then a 3 on their scheduled update).
	127	+** YELLOW: the yellow bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance stayed the same over the two assessments, meaning their scores remain unchanged
	128	+** GREEN: the green bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance improved between the two assessments, meaning their scores went down (e.g. someone could have gotten a 3 on their initial assessment and then a 1 on their scheduled update).
	129	+* Clearly, such data provides a useful tool and leads to some questions/
	130	+
	131	+why this would be useful
125	125	)))