Changes for page RCI by OU

Last modified by Davide Bonicelli on 2014/08/21 15:56
From version Icon 5.6 Icon
edited by karimpirani
on 2014/07/14 15:51
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 5.5 Icon
edited by karimpirani
on 2014/07/14 15:47
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
96 96  
97 97  [[image:rci report - by ou.PNG]]
98 98  
99 -Note initially that this is only the first page of the report. Because we selected Melbourne as an OU we wanted to consider when entering our parameters (and because it is first alphabetically), it was elaborated upon in this page. Each individual OU will occupy a unique page in your report.
99 +Note initially that this is only the first page of the report. Because we selected Melbourne as an OU we wanted to consider when entering our parameters (and because it is first alphabetically), it was elaborated upon in this page.
100 100  
101 101  Note also that the instrument of our choice was CANS, but this report can apply to other instruments as well.
102 102  
... ... @@ -117,9 +117,14 @@
117 117  
118 118  __Middle (DATA)__
119 119  
120 -* Because we selected Melbourne as an OU of interest, its data is provided for us
121 -* We can see that there were 12 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters. This is because each row below the graph (representing a single domain or item) adds up to 12, implying 12 clients.
122 -* The domains and items you choose will be the ones that will be considered (e.g. Child Strengths and Culture)
123 -* The graph above and numerical data below show the same data, except for the fact that the
124 -*
120 +* Because we checked off the "aggregate OU" box for this example, all OUs are represented in the data.
121 +* Because there were 68 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters, 68 appears as the total for all rows.
122 +* Because we selected 0,1,2, and 3 as acceptable scores, this report generates a column for each of those options and shows us the number and percentage of individuals who fell into those buckets.
123 +* Because we chose "Child Strengths" as our domain, the results for it (and its items) are shown.
124 +
125 +The rows thus represent the assessment items.
126 +
127 +The columns represent the scores for those items.
128 +
129 +The intersection of the two offers a data point, such as the number of individuals who responded with a score of 2 for the "Educational" item.
125 125  )))