Changes for page RCI by OU

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
96	96
97	97	[[image:rci report - by ou.PNG]]
98	98
99		-Note initially that this is only the first page of the report. Because we selected Melbourne as an OU we wanted to consider when entering our parameters (and because it is first alphabetically), it was elaborated upon in this page.
	99	+Note initially that this is only the first page of the report. Because we selected Melbourne as an OU we wanted to consider when entering our parameters (and because it is first alphabetically), it was elaborated upon in this page. Each individual OU will occupy a unique page in your report.
100	100
101	101	Note also that the instrument of our choice was CANS, but this report can apply to other instruments as well.
102	102
...	...	@@ -117,14 +117,16 @@
117	117
118	118	__Middle (DATA)__
119	119
120		-* Because we checked off the "aggregate OU" box for this example, all OUs are represented in the data.
121		-* Because there were 68 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters, 68 appears as the total for all rows.
122		-* Because we selected 0,1,2, and 3 as acceptable scores, this report generates a column for each of those options and shows us the number and percentage of individuals who fell into those buckets.
123		-* Because we chose "Child Strengths" as our domain, the results for it (and its items) are shown.
	120	+* Because we selected Melbourne as an OU of interest, its data is provided for us
	121	+* We can see that there were 12 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters. This is because each row below the graph (representing a single domain or item) adds up to 12, implying 12 clients.
	122	+* There will always be three columns on the bottom: one for decline, one for no change, and one for improvement
	123	+* The domains and items you choose will be the ones that will be considered (e.g. Child Strengths and Culture)
	124	+* The graph above and numerical data below show the same data, except for the fact that the numerical information provides absolute quantities (i.e. exact number of clients) instead of just percentages
	125	+* However, the bar graph is often easier to understand and serves as a visual guide to your results. In fact, it has been color-coded to make the process easier:
	126	+** RED: the red bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance declined between the two assessments, meaning their scores went up (e.g. someone could have gotten a 1 on their initial assessment and then a 3 on their scheduled update).
	127	+** YELLOW: the yellow bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance stayed the same over the two assessments, meaning their scores remain unchanged
	128	+** GREEN: the green bar represents the percentage of clients whose performance improved between the two assessments, meaning their scores went down (e.g. someone could have gotten a 3 on their initial assessment and then a 1 on their scheduled update).
	129	+* Clearly, such data provides a useful tool and leads to some questions/
124	124
125		-The rows thus represent the assessment items.
126		-
127		-The columns represent the scores for those items.
128		-
129		-The intersection of the two offers a data point, such as the number of individuals who responded with a score of 2 for the "Educational" item.
	131	+why this would be useful
130	130	)))