Changes for page RCI by OU
Last modified by Davide Bonicelli on 2014/08/21 15:56
Summary
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ 96 96 97 97 [[image:rci report - by ou.PNG]] 98 98 99 -Note initially that this is only the first page of the report. Because we selected Melbourne as an OU we wanted to consider when entering our parameters (and because it is first alphabetically), it was elaborated upon in this page. 99 +Note initially that this is only the first page of the report. Because we selected Melbourne as an OU we wanted to consider when entering our parameters (and because it is first alphabetically), it was elaborated upon in this page. Each individual OU will occupy a unique page in your report. 100 100 101 101 Note also that the instrument of our choice was CANS, but this report can apply to other instruments as well. 102 102 ... ... @@ -109,21 +109,17 @@ 109 109 110 110 * the title of the report is featured prominently at the center of the first page 111 111 * many of the parameters you entered are also included for your ease of remembrance (this includes the period of time you indicated was of interest and the OUs you selected). 112 +* also vital here is the two assessment reasons listed, as this is what provides the basis for any comparison. 112 112 113 113 __Bottom__ 114 114 115 -* your report includes a time stamp of the exact date and time the report was ordered. 116 +* your report includes a time stamp of the exact date and time the report was ordered (not pictured above). 116 116 117 117 __Middle (DATA)__ 118 118 119 -* Because we checked off the "aggregate OU" box for this example, all OUs are represented in the data. 120 -* Because there were 68 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters, 68 appears as the total for all rows. 121 -* Because we selected 0,1,2, and 3 as acceptable scores, this report generates a column for each of those options and shows us the number and percentage of individuals who fell into those buckets. 122 -* Because we chose "Child Strengths" as our domain, the results for it (and its items) are shown. 123 - 124 -The rows thus represent the assessment items. 125 - 126 -The columns represent the scores for those items. 127 - 128 -The intersection of the two offers a data point, such as the number of individuals who responded with a score of 2 for the "Educational" item. 120 +* Because we selected Melbourne as an OU of interest, its data is provided for us 121 +* We can see that there were 12 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters. This is because each row below the graph (representing a single domain or item) adds up to 12, implying 12 clients. 122 +* The domains and items you choose will be the ones that will be considered (e.g. Child Strengths and Culture) 123 +* The graph above and numerical data below show the same data, except for the fact that the 124 +* 129 129 )))