Changes for page Outcome Comparison Report

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.karimpirani
	1	+XWiki.jmendelsohn

Content

...	...	@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1		-The Outcome Comparison Report allows you to compare change in domain items over time and based on the reason for assessment (e.g. going from the initial visit to a discharge).
	1	+The Outcome Comparison Report allows you to compare change in domains over time and based on the reason for assessment (e.g. going from the initial visit to a discharge).
2	2
3	3
4	4	__CREATING AN OUTCOME COMPARISON REPORT__
...	...	@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@
60	60	* **"Organizational Units"**: The organizational unit represents the geographic or other division of systems. In order to select your preferred organization unit, simply click the down arrow to expand the options, and then proceed to check all the applicable boxes for all locations (e.g. "Sydney") you are interested in for your report.
61	61	* **"Aggregate OU"**: this will combine data from all OUs into one data point
62	62	* **"Reporting Units"**: The reporting unit represents the classification of clients based on various factors through the system of tagging. You can select all reporting units of interest by checking all appropriate boxes (and sub-boxes) you want your report to incorporate. Note: this is an optional parameter, and you may leave this blank and still generate a report that includes - as a default - all RUs.
63		-* **"Assessors"**: you can choose to look at specific users through this option by adding certain individuals
64	64	* **"Scores"**: you can select the scores to include in your progression report (e.g. choosing only 1 and 2 will show you the all individuals who had those scores over the period of time you selected)
65	65	* **"Age Ranges"**: allows you to select which group of people, based on age, to include in your data
66	66
...	...	@@ -102,4 +102,42 @@
102	102
103	103	(((
104	104	(% style="line-height: 19.600000381469727px;" %)**__UNDERSTANDING YOUR OUTCOME COMPARISON REPORT__**
	104	+
	105	+
	106	+Next, we will look at the report itself and the information it conveys. Please see the sample report below for reference purposes.
	107	+
	108	+[[image:outcome comparison - report.PNG||width="100%"]]
	109	+
	110	+
	111	+
	112	+
	113	+Let's begin dissecting the report and the data it provides. Remember, again, that the Outcome Comparison report aims to provide you with critical assessment information and results about a specific domain (and its items) over any period of time and reason for assessment.
	114	+
	115	+__Top__
	116	+
	117	+* the title of the report is featured prominently at the center of the first page
	118	+* many of the parameters you entered are also included for your ease of remembrance (this includes the period of time you indicated was of interest, the OUs you selected, the domain you are investigating (and the question items associated with that domain), and the status of clients you chose.
	119	+
	120	+__Bottom__
	121	+
	122	+* your report includes a time stamp of the exact date and time the report was ordered.
	123	+
	124	+__Middle (DATA)__
	125	+
	126	+
	127	+
	128	+* First, note that the data are divided into two sides: one side for each reason for assessment
	129	+* Also, there is an arrow drawn to reaffirm the utility of the report in assessing change from one reason for assessment to the next
	130	+* Because we checked off the "aggregate OU" box for this example, all OUs are represented in the data.
	131	+* Because there were 4 people who met all the criteria we set out in our parameters, 4 appears as the total for all rows.
	132	+* Because we selected 0,1,2, and 3 as acceptable scores, this report generates a column for each of those options and shows us the number and percentage of individuals who fell into those buckets.
	133	+* Because we chose "Culture" as our domain, the results for it (and its items) are shown.
	134	+
	135	+The rows thus represent the assessment items.
	136	+
	137	+The columns represent the scores for those items.
	138	+
	139	+The intersection of the two offers a data point, such as the number of individuals who responded with a score of 2 for the "Identity" item.
	140	+
	141	+To make a comparison, all you need to do is compare these data points. For example, 2 individuals had a score of "1" for language during the initial assessment, but 0 had the same score for the discharge. Note also that the 0 column (for scores) went from 2 initially to 4 later. This kind of comparison allows you to gauge progress and development.
105	105	)))